Inventory & Supply Chain · Inventory Analysis

Dead Stock Identification

Every warehouse accumulates stock that's functionally dead — no sales in months, no open orders, no forecasted demand — but it sits in the system mixed in with genuinely slow-but-healthy SKUs, and nobody runs the analysis to tell the two apart because it means manually cross-referencing sales history, open orders and forecast against every low-velocity SKU. The dead stock keeps taking up warehouse space and tying up capital, and by the time someone finally does the analysis — usually during an annual write-off review — items that could have recovered real value through early liquidation have aged into something only a salvage buyer wants.

STARTING PRICE

From €299

Standard tier · Multi-step workflow with AI extraction/decisioning and 2-3 integrations.

Get a quote →

Saves roughly 3-5 hrs/week for an inventory or merchandising team.

How the automation works

We continuously score SKUs against a genuine dead-stock definition — no sales velocity, no open customer orders, no forecasted demand, and no active promotional or seasonal explanation for the lull — rather than flagging anything simply below a velocity threshold, which would catch legitimately slow but healthy items too. Confirmed dead-stock candidates get a recommended disposition based on quantity, condition and category: return-to-vendor where the agreement allows it, liquidation channel (B2B liquidator, outlet, marketplace) with an estimated recovery value, or write-off where recovery isn't realistic. The scoring runs on a recurring schedule so items get flagged as they cross into dead-stock territory rather than accumulating for a year before anyone looks.

Process flow

Dead Stock Identification — process diagram Flow diagram: Sales, order and forecast data syncs → Score against dead-stock definition → Filter out false positives → Estimate recovery value → Recommend disposition → Route for approval. Sales, orderand forecastTRIGGERScore againstdead-stockAIFilter outfalse positivesAIEstimaterecovery valueAIRecommenddispositionOUTPUTRoute forapprovalOUTPUT
  1. 01

    Sales, order and forecast data syncs trigger

    Sales velocity, open customer orders and demand forecast per SKU sync in on a recurring schedule from the inventory and order management systems.

  2. 02

    Score against dead-stock definition ai

    Each SKU is scored against a genuine dead-stock definition — sustained zero or near-zero velocity, no open orders, no forecasted demand, no seasonal explanation — not a single velocity threshold.

  3. 03

    Filter out false positives ai

    SKUs with a plausible non-dead explanation — new launch still ramping, known seasonal item currently off-season, active promotional hold — are filtered out before candidates are finalized.

  4. 04

    Estimate recovery value ai

    Confirmed candidates get an estimated recovery value per disposition path (return-to-vendor, liquidation channel, write-off) based on quantity, condition and category comparables.

  5. 05

    Recommend disposition output

    A ranked disposition recommendation is generated per candidate — the path with the best estimated recovery given the item's condition and vendor agreement terms.

  6. 06

    Route for approval output

    Recommendations route to the appropriate approver based on dollar value, with the underlying data attached so the decision doesn't require re-running the analysis manually.

Get a quote for this automation →

Inputs

  • SKU sales velocity history
  • Open customer order data
  • Demand forecast per SKU
  • Vendor return agreement terms
  • Known seasonal/promotional calendar

Outputs

  • Confirmed dead-stock candidate list
  • Recommended disposition path per SKU
  • Estimated recovery value
  • Approval-routed liquidation packet

Works with

Prefer a fully custom build instead of an off-the-shelf integration? We scope both options during your free consultation — most jobs like this one work fine on standard connectors, but higher-volume or non-standard systems sometimes need bespoke API work, reflected in the complex tier.

Where this goes wrong if you get it wrong

  • Flagging anything below a flat velocity threshold as dead stock catches legitimately slow-but-healthy SKUs — a specialty item that sells five units a year at high margin isn't dead, and treating it that way pushes good inventory into liquidation it doesn't need.
  • A new product launch that's still ramping looks identical to dead stock on raw velocity alone — the scoring needs a launch-date check and grace period, or every new SKU gets flagged as dead in its first quarter.
  • Return-to-vendor terms have real constraints (return windows, restocking fees, condition requirements) that a recovery estimate has to account for — recommending RTV on stock that's past the vendor's return window or in non-returnable condition wastes the effort of routing it for approval.
  • Recommending liquidation for stock that still has open customer backorders or is committed to a future promotion destroys real, already-committed demand — the dead-stock check has to cross-reference open orders and promotional calendars before a SKU is confirmed as a candidate, not just check recent sales velocity.

Frequently asked questions

How is dead stock different from slow-moving stock?

Dead stock has no sales velocity, no open orders and no forecasted demand with no plausible explanation like seasonality; slow-moving stock still sells, just infrequently, and isn't flagged as a candidate.

Does this account for vendor return windows?

Yes — return-to-vendor is only recommended where the vendor agreement's return window and condition requirements are actually still met; otherwise a liquidation channel or write-off is recommended instead.

How does it avoid flagging new products as dead stock?

New SKUs get a grace period based on launch date before they're eligible to be scored as dead-stock candidates, so early low velocity on a ramping product isn't mistaken for a dead item.

What recovery value estimate accuracy should we expect?

Estimates are based on category and condition comparables from prior liquidation outcomes and are directional for prioritization — actual recovery depends on the liquidation channel and negotiation at time of sale.

Relevant industries

RetailDistributionManufacturing